Currently Reading:

Currently Reading:
Gut Feelings: The Intelligence of the Unconscious, by Gerd Gigerenzer

Wednesday, February 25, 2009

Who the Hell is Martin Guerre?

I had to read "The Return of Martin Guerre" for my Trials class. It sucked. Now I realize, and have taken into account, the fact that historical writing is not meant to be entertaining, but for God's sake, the author of this book could have at least made an attempt. Her writing style was confusing and boring, the way she told the story (and the way she referenced trial documents and transcripts throughout) was disorganized, and many of the details she included were quite dry and unnecessary. The story itself was interesting, but she was horrible at telling it.

I'm glad it's over.

Monday, February 23, 2009

A Note On Naked Lunch

I have a policy: at page 50 of every book, I stop and decide whether or not to continue reading. I gave Naked Lunch the full 50 pages, and I decided to return it to the UWW library.

This book was supposed to horrify and disgust me, make me cringe and gag, make me sad and sick. It did not. I was not shocked or outraged, I was indifferent. Maybe I'm just heartless, but I could not dismiss the nagging feeling that drug users get what they get. So it goes.

I stopped reading because I felt there was no point and the book was intolerably boring (and confusing, but not in the good way). I might have kept reading if Burroughs had actually given up drugs after writing this book, just to support his efforts. He did not, so I owe him nothing.

Sunday, February 22, 2009

Well Of Course That's How Doctors Think

I just finished How Doctors Think, by Jerome Groopman. It came highly recommended by the guys who wrote Freakonomics; needless to say, it was well below par. It stated very obvious things in a very roundabout, repetitive way.

It also broke one of my cardinal rules: leave out your religious beliefs, please and thank you. This guy (subtly) injected his own religious beliefs into a number of the stories, which I did not appreciate. To his credit, though, he did acknowledge some benefits of atheistic/agnostic viewpoints, however briefly.

If you must read this one, skim it.

Thursday, February 19, 2009

Armageddon in Retrospect in Retrospect

I've been on a Vonnegut spree for a few days now and I always enjoy his brutal honesty, irreverence, and twisted humor. Armageddon in Retrospect was interesting, but I had false hopes for this book from the beginning: the second chapter was utterly brilliant and hilarious, which I should have known could not possibly have continued throughout the rest of the book. I wish I had read the second chapter last.

As I said to Lawton today, "It's a good book, but I don't know if you'll like it. You and you're Republican values and all..." To which he had a witty, however delayed, response. I didn't have a comeback. Maybe I'll have one tomorrow. Digression aside, the book is worth reading, but don't expect the entire book to be as delightful as the second chapter (a transcript of the speech he wrote and his son gave at Clowes Hall, Indianapolis in April, 2007 shortly after his death). So it goes.

Favorite Quote(s): "If anyone here should wind up on a gurney in a lethal injection facility, here is what your last words should be: 'This will certainly teach me a lesson.'"

"Religion can be Tylenol for a lot of unhappy people, and I'm so glad it works."

"I have the humorist Paul Krasner to thank for pointing out the big difference between George W. Bush and Hitler: Hitler was elected."

Haha

Wednesday, February 18, 2009

I Don't Have the Balls or Focus to Write a Real "This I Believe" Essay

"This I Believe" is a selection of essays written for NPR (out of New York, I believe). People submitted their stories/beliefs; people like Einstein, Gloria Steinem, William F. Buckley, and regular people like a nurse in Manhattan.

Decent book. Too much talk about religion, but I guess when someone asks you what you believe, the first thing that generally comes to mind is spirituality/religion/afterlife... Lawton wrote his own "This I Believe" after reading the book, but I am not sure what the most significant belief I hold is. So, I'll write a few one liners that constitute part of my beliefs, interpret them as you will.

I believe that reading makes you smarter, no matter what you read.

I believe in the capitalist system.

I believe in America.

I believe that the day I fully embraced my desire to wear only sweats (and everything that sweats represent: comfort, convenience, time saving, and cost effectiveness), was the day I fully embraced myself. Haha.

I believe people are who they are. You can't change that, so embrace it and play to your strengths.

I believe in doing whatever makes you happy without imposing on others' right to be happy.

I believe in abortion, gay rights, animal rights, and tolerance, even if you think people are full of shit.

I believe there is no god and no afterlife.

I believe that the opportunity for my success so far was made possible by my dad.

I believe House is not miserable as Wilson, Cuddy and some "insightful" patients insist he is.

This I believe.

Monday, February 16, 2009

Yes, God Bless You, Dr. Kevorkian

77 pages + huge print = 33 minutes and 42 seconds of reading.

Glod Bless You, Dr. Kevorkian, by Kurt Vonnegut, was great. The deal is: Vonnegut coordinates with Dr. Kevorkian to go through a series of near death experiences (Kevorkian makes him 3/4 dead then brings him back) so he can interview dead people. There are three defining characteristics:
1. Each interview is incredibly short: Vonnegut captures the pure essence of each person's existence in just a few words
2. The intro line and sign off follow a pattern, look for it
3. There are factual details embedded in the text about Vonnegut's own beliefs and also about Dr. Kevorkian's trials

If you need a quick read to get back on track with 52 in 52, read this; but be careful, sometimes you forget it's fiction.

Favorite Quote: "I am a humanist, which means, in part, I behave decently with no expectation of reward or punishment in an Afterlife."

Sunday, February 15, 2009

Choke by Chuck

I'll make this brief: apparently, most people are disturbed/disgusted with Choke, by Chuck Palahniuk (yes, the author of Fight Club); I thought it was brilliant up until the last 30 pages or so when it became semi-ridiculous. Though the very end makes up for pages 260-291 (out of 293).

His theme is fascinating and makes a great deal of sense, in a sick (and on some levels completely accurate) way. It's beautiful.